E-Hydrogen Highway of California, et. al.

.
Electric motors are 4 TIMES THE ENVIRONMENTAL DISASTER as gasoline engines of equal power, because all new electrical-generation plants for many decades have been (and for the foreseeable future will be) fueled by coal (or in a few cases by natural gas, which is also a hydrocarbon producing the same amount of greenhouse gases) -- AND 75% OF THE ENERGY CONTENT OF THE COAL OR NATURAL GAS IS EXPENDED IN GENERATING THE ELECTRICITY!!!

The Chevrolet Volt, which General Motors estimates will get 230 miles per gallon of gasoline in city driving, IS A FRAUD FROM AN ENVIRONMENTAL VIEWPOINT!!!

The Volt is a “plug in” electric vehicle with a range of 40 miles. So for the first 40 miles of each trip, the Volt’s mileage on the basis of gasoline consumption is infinite.

However, when the Volt has traveled 40 miles and its batteries are exhausted, it has a gasoline engine that, INSTEAD OF POWERING THE CAR DIRECTLY, kicks in to power a generator which re-charges the batteries to keep the car running!!!

So, for the portion of any trip over 40 miles, the Volt’s mileage as measured by gasoline consumption is going to be 25% of the mileage of a conventional gasoline-powered automobile (assuming that the Volt loses the same 75% in electrical generation as the country’s electric utility industry).

So if you assume virtually all of your driving comprises trips exceeding 40 miles each, your mileage in terms of gasoline is 25% of a conventional gasoline-powered car. And if you assume all of your driving comprises trips of less than 40 miles between re-charging, your mileage in terms of gasoline is infinite.

Obviously, General Motors could have picked any number it wanted!!!

And it arbitrarily chose 230 miles per gallon of gasoline!!!

HOWEVER, THIS IS MISLEADING AND, INDEED, FRAUDULENT BECAUSE IT IS DESIGNED TO FOOL THE PUBLIC INTO BELIEVING THAT THE VOLT IS ENVIRONMENTALLY DESIRABLE -- RATHER THAN THE ENVIRONMENTAL DISASTER THAT IT IS!!!

The two oldest items (in terms of time/date posted) are stories in the New York Times and Wall Street Journal, both dated 11 August 2009, that were included by Pat in the original proposal of this topic on 17 August 2009 to demonstrate how the country’s media uncritically bought the fraud perpetrated by General Motors’ announcement of 230 miles per gallon for the Volt.

The next 2 articles (in terms of time/date posted) result from Googling “Chevrolet Volt” on 3 November 2009. More than half of the top 50 “hits” were General Motors web sites and virtually all of the rest were regurgitations of General Motors propaganda. Virtually the only 2 exceptions =

The U.S. News & World Report article of 11 August 2009 which, unlike the gullible NY Times and the gullible Wall Street Journal, actually explained the fraud that General Motors was perpetrating.

The year-old Car and Driver article of October 2008 which, after discussing at length such issues as styling and the tremendous extra costs of the batteries, etc., finally reported uncritically the claims of General Motors regarding the cost of the plug-in electricity on a per-mile basis vs. gasoline costs.

First, General Motors claims regarding the cost of the electricity are suspect, since they almost certainly contain quite a bit of hydroelectric power which costs virtually nothing -- but no new dams have been built in the U.S. for many decades.

Second, even the cost of electricity from a coal-fired electrical plant is not a true measure of the environmental disaster that a coal-fired electrical plant is, because the price of coal is always a mere fraction of the cost of crude oil if they are compared in terms of energy content.

Third, General Motors ignores the 75% environmental disaster from its gasoline engine kicking in after 40 miles between re-charging.

SO FOR BOTH THE FIRST 40 MILES BETWEEN RE-CHARGING AND THE ADDITIONAL MILES WHEN THE GASOLINE ENGINE KICKS IN TO GENERATE MORE ELECTRICITY, THE VOLT IS AN ENVIRONMENTAL DISASTER!!!
.
Post Reply
johnkarls
Posts: 2040
Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 8:43 pm

E-Hydrogen Highway of California, et. al.

Post by johnkarls »

Reading Liberally Editorial Note – for detailed current info on California’s 23 hydrogen refilling stations (SF Bay area – LA – Tahoe) and kicked off by California state funding begining 7/21/2005, please see http://www.hydrogenhighway.ca.gov.

Hydrogen highway
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A hydrogen highway is a chain of hydrogen-equipped filling stations and other infrastructure along a road or highway which allow hydrogen powered cars to travel.

A hydrogen filling infrastructure is generally assumed to be a pre-requisite for mass utilization of hydrogen cars. For instance, William Clay Ford Jr. has stated that infrastructure is one of three factors (also including costs and manufacturability in high volumes) that hold back the marketability of fuel cell cars.[1] (On the flip side, some commentators such as Amory Lovins in Natural Capitalism, argue that such infrastructure may not be necessary). Hence, there are plans and proposals to begin developing hydrogen highways through private and public funds.

The use of hydrogen cars has been proposed as a means to reduce local pollution and carbon emissions because hydrogen fuel cell cars emit clean exhaust. However, as long as the majority of hydrogen continues to be produced by burning fossil fuels, some pollution is emitted by the hydrogen manufacturing process.[1][2]

Contents =

· 1 Canada
o 1.1 British Columbia
· 2 Japan
· 3 Scandinavia
o 3.1 Norway
o 3.2 Sweden
o 3.3 Denmark
· 4 United States
o 4.1 California
o 4.2 Florida
o 4.3 East Coast
· 5 See also
· 6 References
· 7 Notes
· 8 External links
Canada
For more details on this topic, see BC hydrogen highway.
British Columbia
In British Columbia, Canada, the BC Hydrogen Highway is planned to link Vancouver and Whistler, host city and alpine venue of the 2010 Winter Olympics. It is targeted for full implementation by the start of the games. Currently seven fueling stations are being planned, located in Victoria, Richmond, Surrey, Vancouver, Squamish, and Whistler. On March 13, 2007, Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper announced funding of almost $200 million Canadian for environmental projects in B.C. including the hydrogen highway. [3]
Japan
For more details on this topic, see Hydrogen highway (Japan).
Japan's hydrogen highway is part of the Japan hydrogen fuel cell project. Twelve hydrogen fueling stations have been built in 11 cities in Japan.
Scandinavia
For more details on this topic, see Scandinavian hydrogen highway partnership.
The Scandinavian Hydrogen Highway Partnership (SHHP) links the three current hydrogen highways HyNor, Hydrogen Link and HyFuture.
Norway
Hynor- In Norway, is a 7 station hydrogen highway from Oslo to Stavanger is under construction and is expected to be completed by 2009.
Sweden
Hydrogen Sweden (formerly Hyfuture / SamVäte i Väst) is the development of a hydrogen highway system in the western region of Sweden.[2][3]
Denmark
The hydrogen link network is a planned 15 station Nordic Transportation Network (NTN) that serves to link Denmark, Norway, Sweden and Germany.
United States
There are plans and proposals for hydrogen highways in the United States. In August 2008, fuelcelltoday reported that three new hydrogen fueling stations were opening in the U.S., bringing the total to 70 in the country.[4] In April 2009, however, BNET Auto reported that there are currently 65 hydrogen stations in the U.S.[5]
California
For more details on this topic, see California Hydrogen Highway.

Hydrogen fueling stations began to be built in California by the California Fuel Cell Partnership around 1999 or 2000. However, they were not systematically positioned to form a hydrogen highway.

California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger mentioned having a hydrogen highway in California when he ran for Governor. Upon winning he reaffirmed his position in a State of the State Address on January 6, 2004 by saying:
I am going to encourage the building of a hydrogen highway to take us to the environmental future... I intend to show the world that economic growth and the environment can coexist. And if you want to see it, then come to California.... Schwarzenegger introduced his "Vision 2010" plan. The main objective was for every citizen in California to have access to hydrogen fuel along the state highways by 2010. The plan includes the construction of 150 to 200 hydrogen stations to be spaced out a maximum of every 20 miles.

On July 21, 2005, Schwarzenegger signed a Senate Bill (SB) 76 to fund the first year of the California Hydrogen Highway project. The bill provided $6.5 million to build the Hydrogen Highway Networkup, known as CaH2Net, with up to three hydrogen fueling stations, as well as allowing leasing or purchase of hydrogen vehicles by the state and requiring development of standards for hydrogen fuel by 2008.[6] Senate Bill (SB) 1505, signed by Governor Schwarzenegger in 2007, put the environmental requirements described in the California Hydrogen Highway Blueprint Plan into statute. In January 2008, the Los Angeles Times reported that three of the hydrogen fueling stations had closed in recognition of the current lack of hydrogen vehicles.[7] In August 2008, however, fuelcelltoday reported that a new hydrogen fueling station would soon open in California.[4]

As of March 2009, according to Greenwire, 24 hydrogen fueling stations are operating in California.[8]
Florida
On February 18, 2005, Jeb Bush, Governor of Florida, announced proposed legislation (called the Florida Energy Technologies Act) to promote hydrogen technologies in the state. He made this announcement at the ground-breaking of the first fueling station of a proposed hydrogen highway from Orlando to Tampa.[9]
East Coast
The East Coast Hydrogen SuperHighway or NY Hydrogen H2IWay was planned, as of 2006, to extend from New York City to Albany, and further to upstate NY in order to reach Montreal, as well as especially to the west to Buffalo, along the major New York Thruway with further linking to the Interprovincial Hydrogen Corridor planned between Detroit, Toronto and Montreal.[10].
See also
· Alternative Fuels Plan
· Hydrogen economy
· Hydrogen station
· Compressed hydrogen tube trailer
· Liquid hydrogen tank truck
References
1. ^ 2006 EFCF paper on hydrogen efficiency
2. ^ Hydrogen Sweden
3. ^ Hydrogen Sweden West Coast Highway
4. ^ a b "Three New Hydrogen Refuelling Stations Open in the USA"
5. ^ Motavalli, Jim. "What Happened to the Hydrogen Highway?" BNET Auto, April 28, 2009
6. ^ California SB76 Facts
7. ^ Bensinger, Ken. "It’s a bumpy ride on the Hydrogen Highway", Los Angeles Times, January 11, 2008, p. C-1
8. ^ "Has Schwarzenegger's hydrogen highway gone bust?" Greenwire, March 10, 2009 (subscription required)
9. ^ Gov. Bush breaks ground on Florida's 'hydrogen highway'
10. ^ 2006 report
Notes
· ^ Motavalli, Jim (2001). Breaking Gridlock: Moving Towards Transportation That Works. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books. pp. 155–156. ISBN 1-57805-039-1.
· ^ Romm, Joseph. The Hype About Hydrogen, 2nd Edition, 2005, Island Press, ISBN 1-55963-704-8
External links
· Selected Hydrogen Fueling Stations in California, USA
· California Hydrogen Highway
· Florida's Hydrogen Program
· BC Hydrogen Highway
· SHHP
· Hydrogen Highway, Norway to Germany
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen_highway"

Post Reply

Return to “Reference Materials – General Motors and the EPA Perpetrating Fraud Re the Chevrolet Volt – Nov 18”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests