Bob Herbert Turned His Back On America’s Inner Cities

Post Reply
johnkarls
Posts: 2034
Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 8:43 pm

Bob Herbert Turned His Back On America’s Inner Cities

Post by johnkarls »

.
We have discussed many times in the past how the “1% vs. 99%” campaign in the mainstream media is fraudulent.

Because the implication is that the proponents of the campaign actually represent the interests of, inter alia, America’s Permanent Undercaste.

[The permanent bottom of American society is America’s UNIQUE Undercaste which has been described repeatedly and consistently by the U.S. Government for the last 50 years as the 30% of the population which is illiterate AS DEFINED AS BEING UNABLE TO READ THE WARNING LABEL ON A CAN OF RAT POISON, and which causes America to CONSISTENTLY RANK AT THE BOTTOM OF ALL DEVELOPED COUNTRIES in terms of any measure of civilization, such as life expectancy, academic achievement, social mobility, infant mortality, etc., etc.]

Obviously, the proponents of the “1% vs. 99%” campaign “frankly don’t give a damn” (to quote Rhett Butler in “Gone With The Wind”) about America’s Permanent Undercaste!!! [Presumably, because there is no one else to represent them!!!]

As was on prominent display when Yours Truly attempted to provide tutoring and mentoring for 10 million American inner-city children from K-12 with a guarantee of college tuition -- from $84 billion that was owed to him from 15 of the world’s largest financial institutions and which had been pledged in legally-binding fashion to provide the K-12 tutoring/mentoring + college tuition guarantee.

Details are contained in the third and fourth sections of this website entitled “Inner-City Holocaust and America’s Apartheid ‘Justice’ System (In Honor of Jonathan Kozol and In Memory of John Howard Griffin).”

Our last appeal was to the U.S. Supreme Court where the “Question Presented For Review” was --

“Can state court judges order their decisions which they know are diametrically-opposed to well-settled law, not to be published or cited (a strategy labeled ‘the segregated toilet’ in correspondence with 51 inner-city clergy who represent the 10 million inner-city children who have been disclosed from the outset as the ‘real parties at interest’ in this law suit) in order to flush away the rights of the 10 million inner-city children without disturbing the rights of first-class American citizens -- without violating the ‘Equal Protection of the Law’ requirement of the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution?”

The U.S. Supreme Court on 10/4/2011 refused to accept our appeal!!!

The third and fourth sections of this website not only document how 21 of America’s most-prominent public officials starting with President Obama, any one of whom could have stopped this travesty in its tracks, refused to do so.

And the third and fourth sections document how 43 of America’s media superstars, any one of whom could have stopped this travesty in its tracks, refused to do so.

The fourth posting in the third section of this website, which is THE THIRD of a number of letters sent to each of the 43 media superstars, shows on its second page a list of the 43 media superstars who refused to help.

Bob Herbert is one of the infamous 43.

Post Reply

Return to “Participant Comments - Losing Our Way: An Intimate Portrait of a Troubled America – Feb 11”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest