Suggested Answers to the First Short Quiz

.
Click here for, inter alia --

The First Short Quiz entitled "The 1992 Acquisition of the Democratic Party as a Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of The Establishment" and

The Second Short Quiz entitled “Identity Politics: A ‘Token’ Black President Who ‘Knew His Place’ on the Establishment’s ‘Plantation.’”

[NB: We have always defined “The Establishment” as the billionaires who, since 1992, have “owned” virtually all the pols of both political parties as a result of campaign contributions, who “own” many (if not most) of the members of The Mainstream Media, and who “own” many members of academia.]
Post Reply
johnkarls
Posts: 2033
Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 8:43 pm

Suggested Answers to the First Short Quiz

Post by johnkarls »

.
Suggested Answers to the First Short Quiz
The 1992 Acquisition of the Democratic Party as a Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of The Establishment


Question 1

Did Bill Clinton win the 1992 Presidential Election with only 43.01% of the popular vote based on his Campaign Theme “to end welfare as we know it”?

Answer 1

Yes.

Question 2

Did Bill Clinton “end welfare as we know it” by signing a bill on 8/22/1996, in the middle of his re-election campaign, to abolish the Aid To Families With Dependent Children Program which had been a Jewel in the Crown of Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal since 1935?

Answer 2

Yes.

Question 3

Was Bill Clinton re-elected with 49.2% of the popular vote based on his Campaign Theme that he had “ended welfare as we know it”?

Answer 3

Yes.

Question 4

When Bill Clinton “ended welfare as we know it,” was Yours Truly the Volunteer National Treasurer of the “I Have A Dream Program”® that was engaged in 178 projects in 51 American cities, each of which 178 projects adopted an entire third-grade class of an inner-city school or an entire third-grade-class cohort of an inner-city housing project and provided each “Dreamer” with a tutor and mentor through high school graduation with a guarantee of college tuition?

Answer 4

Yes.

Question 5

Even before Bill Clinton “ended welfare as we know it,” were the typical conditions facing each of those 178 projects in 51 American cities --

• SINGLE-DIGIT high-school graduation rates for the class immediately preceding, and the class immediately following, the Dreamer class?
• 99% of all Dreamers living in single-adult households?
• 95% of all Dreamers living in single-adult households headed by a druggie?
• 75%-80% of all Dreamers living in a single-adult household headed by a druggie who handed over all receipts to the pusher so that the kids had to steal just in order to eat?
• Virtually-universal recognition by inner-city 5-year-olds that their only realistic career objectives are pusher or pimp, or girl friend of a pusher or pimp graduating to whore?

Answer 5

Yes, yes, yes, yes and yes.

Question 6

BTW, did the earliest of those 178 projects typically raise those SINGLE-DIGIT high-school graduation rates to 60% - 65%?

Answer 6

Yes.

Question 7

And when Yours Truly realized that 50% of the female “Dreamers” had become pregnant and, as a practical matter, dropped out and then ascertained that the reason why the 50% of female “Dreamers” who had NOT become pregnant was that each had had an IHAD tutor/mentor who stressed “you could make something out of yourself with the IHAD program and it would BREAK MY HEART if you didn’t” -- and when, as a result, Yours Truly asked the later projects to focus on the fact that most tutors/mentors had become “surrogate parents” AND THE TUTORS/MENTORS SHOULD MAKE SIMILAR REQUESTS of all their “Dreamers” (especially the females) -- were we able to typically drive those SINGLE-DIGIT high-school graduation rates TO OVER 90% GRADUATING HIGH SCHOOL AND CONTINUING TO COLLEGE?

Answer 7

Yes, we were able to typically drive those SINGLE-DIGIT high-school graduation rates TO OVER 90% GRADUATING HIGH SCHOOL AND CONTINUING TO COLLEGE!!!

Question 8

Did Bill Clinton begin his first term by, “over the ‘dead body’ objections of Labor Unions,” lobbying strenuously for the North American Free Trade (sic) Agreement (“NAFTA”) which, since it COULD NOT BE RATIFIED AS A TREATY BY A TWO-THIRDS VOTE OF THE SENATE AS REQUIRED BY THE CONSTITUTION, was implemented as an ordinary law -- passing the Senate 11/20/1993 by only 61-38 (in other words, NOT the required two-thirds vote for a treaty) with 27 affirmative Democratic votes and passing the House 11/17/1993 by 234-200 with 102 Democratic votes, and being triumphantly signed by Bill Clinton 12/8/1993???

Answer 8

Unfortunately, yes.

Question 9

Did Bill Clinton’s “War on American Workers” feature not only (A) NAFTA pursuant to which so many American jobs have been exported to Mexico, but also (B) a free-trade agreement with China pursuant to which so many American jobs have been exported to China, (C) the Worldwide Free-Trade Agreement creating the World Trade Organization (WTO) pursuant to which so many American jobs have been exported to third-world countries, and (D) approximately 300 additional “free-trade” agreements in order to export American jobs?

Answer 9

Unfortunately – yes, yes, yes and yes.

Question 10

In addition to Bill Clinton’s “ending welfare as we know it” and his eagerly “Exporting American Jobs” with so-called Free-Trade Agreements, did Bill Clinton also REFUSE TO ENFORCE the recently-enacted Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 so that the country would be flooded with de facto “slave labor” that could not complain about any treatment meted out to them for fear of being deported?

Answer 10

Yes, Clinton single-handedly reversed the outcome of the American Civil War!!!

Question 11

Did Bill Clinton’s performance convince “The Establishment” that the Democratic Party could function as equally well as the Republican Party as a WHOLLY-OWNED SUBSIDIARY?

Answer 11

Obviously!!!

Question 12

Have we always defined “The Establishment” as the billionaires who, since 1992, have “owned” virtually all the pols of both political parties as a result of campaign contributions, who “own” many (if not most) of the members of The Mainstream Media, and who “own” many members of academia?

Answer 12

Yes.

Question 13

Do you think The Establishment “laughs all the way to the bank” over the stupidity of the American public in believing in the “Left-Hand Puppet” and the “Right-Hand Puppet” of their Kabuki Theater?

Answer 13

What do you think??? Let’s discuss!!!

Question 14

Do you think The Establishment “laughed all the way to the bank” as it rigged its Kabuki Theater “Left-Hand Puppet” against a Non-Establishment primary challenger in 2016?

Answer 14

What do you think??? Let’s discuss!!!

Question 15

Do you think The Establishment “laughs all the way to the bank” as it repairs its Kabuki Theater “Right-Hand Puppet” to render ineffective a Non-Establishment Candidate who was elected President in 2016?

Answer 15

What do you think??? Let’s discuss!!!

Question 16

Do you think The Establishment “laughed all the way to the bank” over the way “Identity Politics” meant they could get away with putting a “token” in office so that NOTHING NEED BE DONE for the voter group “identifying” with the “token” office holder?

Answer 16

What do you think??? Let’s discuss!!!

Question 17

In other words, can you think of ANYTHING AT ALL that President Obama did for the poor???

(Hint: You can NOT count Obamacare because the poor had already been covered by Medicaid since 1965 pursuant to President Lyndon Johnson’s “Great Society Program” -- Obamacare merely expanded Medicaid to cover the Lower Middle Class.)

Answer 17

What do you think??? Let’s discuss!!!

Question 18

Do you think The Establishment “laughed all the way to the bank” over the COST EFFECTIVENESS of starting a “War on Cops” RATHER THAN DOING THE “HEAVY LIFTING” of providing our inner-city children with a decent education in order to mainstream America’s 30% Permanent Under-Caste?

Answer 18

What do you think??? Let’s discuss!!!



[The Second Short Quiz will focus on The Establishment’s “War on Cops” and, inter alia, whether it benefits the poor upon whom it has been perpetrated.]

Post Reply

Return to “Participant Comments - The War On Cops: How the New Attack on Law & Order Makes Everyone Less Safe by Heather MacDonald - Sep 6”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest