Resurrecting and Re-Invigorating McCain-Feingold

.
The Suggested Discussion Outline for our meeting last evening (May 16) had contained at the very end three Six-Degrees-Of-Separation E-mail Campaigns relating to the “6 most important constitutional issues facing America at the moment” as listed on the face of the “Participant Comments” section of this bulletin board for our May 16 meeting --

Re No. 4 (Campaign Finance), to revive McCain-Feingold public financing of political campaigns with such robust funding that “political contributions” are relegated to the scrap heap of history while extending such financing to Senatorial and Congressional Campaigns.

Re No. 5 (The U.S. Senate’s 60-vote “filibuster” rule), to eliminate it.

Re No. 6 (Authoritarian Rule By Our Intelligence Services), to insist that the illegal interference by our intelligence services in the 2016 Presidential Campaign and its aftermath be prosecuted, for the sake of sound public policy, to the fullest extent of the law.

*****
All three proposals were “approved” unanimously.

The reason for the quotation marks is that we did not achieve our minimum quorum of 6.

We had 8 RSVP’s, and there are usually 1 or 2 members who appear without having RSVP’d.

However, no extras appeared.

And earlier in the week, 2 RSVP’s were hospitalized on an emergency basis and a third RSVP took a bad fall and was bedridden on doctor’s orders.

HOWEVER, all of our Six-Degrees-Of-Separation E-mail Campaigns over our 12.5-year history are collected in the first section of this bulletin board in addition to each appearing below in chronological order with the materials for the meeting in which each was approved.

AND, the comments on the face of the first section of this bulletin board say with respect to our E-mail Campaigns --

“All 27 e-mail campaigns over the years are collected in this section. They include 6 e-mails sent by John Karls that did not receive an official endorsement for the rest of our members to send. The titles of the 21 official recommendations are ALL CAPS and the titles of 6 unofficial recommendations are lower case.”

The requirement for “official” status is either unanimity or, at most, one dissent at a meeting which had at least the minimum quorum of 6 participants.

There were 6 occasions on which Yours Truly felt strongly about an E-mail proposal for which there were two dissents, usually from among more than a dozen participants.

Those “unofficial” campaigns (whose titles are lower case in the first section of this bulletin board) explain that since the U.S. Constitution still contains the Right to Free Speech, Yours Truly had the right to inform his friends of his strong views (virtually all of the 150 recipients of our weekly e-mails are close friends of Yours Truly around the world accumulated over many years).

Bottom line???

Yours Truly had felt so strongly about each of the 3 currently-proposed e-mail campaigns that he would have made them on an unofficial basis if there had been two dissents.

Since, as mentioned above, 3 separate disasters prevented a quorum last evening, the 3 campaigns will move forward on an unofficial basis.

However, even though we fell short of a minimum quorum, the participants were unanimous in supporting each of the 3 campaigns and in recommending that each of them proceed.

Each will be posted here as soon as each is drafted and sent out to our members.

BTW, there was one change. Vis-à-vis the e-mail campaign to revive McCain-Feingold, last evening’s participants decided that it should be directed to Meghan McCain instead of Senator McCain. Because the key to success would be marshaling public opinion. And as a Co-Host of ABC’s “The View,” she is admirably positioned to keep the issue in the public eye until public opinion is marshaled. Which could be aided considerably by her Co-Hosts, each of whom is presumably patriotic.

Respectfully submitted 5/17/2017,

John K.
Post Reply
johnkarls
Posts: 2034
Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 8:43 pm

Resurrecting and Re-Invigorating McCain-Feingold

Post by johnkarls »

.
The following e-mail was sent at 12:23 pm on 5/20/2018 to Senator John McCain via the “Contact Form” on http://www.mccain.senate.gov.

Two things should be noted.

First, the participants at our 5/16/2018 meeting, in unanimously approving the principles contained in this e-mail, thought that it should be directed to Senator McCain’s daughter, Meghan McCain, who as a Co-Host of ABC’s “The View” might be best positioned to marshal public opinion.

However, there was no way to e-mail Ms. McCain at ABC.

Second, our e-mail campaigns traditionally request all of our members to send an already-prepared e-mail such as the one that appears below (A) to the decision maker, and (B) to all of the friends/acquaintances of our members so that, under “Six Degrees of Separation” theory, a zillion identical e-mails will quickly occupy the decision maker’s in box.

However, in the light of Senator McCain’s medical condition, everyone is requested NOT to send similar e-mails.


------------------------------E-mail Sent to Sen. John McCain 5/20/2018------------------------------

The Honorable John S. McCain III
Senior U.S. Senator - Arizona

Dear Sir:

Re: Resurrecting and Re-Invigorating McCain-Feingold

We are very sorry to intrude on your privacy following your most-recent surgery last month after which your son-in-law tweeted about your hugging him and asking him to take care of your daughter, Meghan.

However, the members of the monthly 150-member public-policy study group in Salt Lake City that I have facilitated for the last 12.5 years believe that the way political campaigns are financed has long since meant that only large campaign contributors have any influence on public policy and “Democracy in America” is a myth.

And we agreed that American Democracy could be restored with the resurrection and re-invigoration of public financing of political campaigns.

After all, the U.S. Supreme Court in McConnell vs. Federal Election Commission (2003) upheld the Constitutionality of the McCain-Feingold modifications to public financing in all important respects.

And even in Citizens United vs. Federal Election Commission (2010), 8 of the 9 Supreme Court Justices, in focusing on the peripheral issue of “independent expenditures” under McCain-Feingold, said that legal requirements for disclosure of the ultimate source of such expenditures does NOT violate Free Speech.

It has struck us that restoring “Democracy in America” would only require adequate financing for Presidential and Congressional Campaigns.

After all, it was not that long ago that Presidential Candidate Barack Obama pledged in the 2008 election cycle to accept public financing, which meant refusing all campaign contributions. Though he later renounced his pledge when it became clear that campaign contributions would exceed the public financing.

It should be “child’s play” for any law school graduate to draft amendments to the Federal Election Campaign Act that would --

(A) extend public financing to Senatorial/Congressional Campaigns for any candidate who renounces campaign contributions and who can show a modicum of support by the voting public, and

(B) MOST IMPORTANTLY, provide levels of public financing equal to what would be available to any opponents from campaign contributions, such as gearing it to the amount of campaign contributions being received by competitors (or to recent historical levels if all competing candidates have chosen public financing).

[Indeed, it strikes us that in such a New World, “independent expenditures” accompanied by full disclosure of the sources of such expenditures, would become comparatively insignificant.]

And it strikes us that a simple Press Release from you supporting the resurrection and re-invigoration of the public financing of political campaigns would do quite a bit to get the ball rolling.

And that ultimate success could result from the ability of your daughter, Meghan, as a Co-Host of ABC’s “The View” (with, hopefully, support from all of her Co-Hosts who are presumably patriotic) to marshal public opinion for as long as it takes.

Thank you for your consideration.

And please permit us to say how much we admire how you have coped with adversity during your entire life in order to achieve greatness!!!

Respectfully submitted,

John Karls

PS – We hope you don’t mind our selecting “Thank You” from the 32 choices of topic on your website, but since there was nothing closely related to “Campaign Finance Reform” we thought that “Thank You” was the most appropriate NOT ONLY for all you have done for America BUT ALSO for what you already accomplished with McCain-Feingold.

Post Reply

Return to “The Quartet – Three E-mail Campaigns “Approved” – May 16”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests