11/9/11: BENEFITING AMN TAXPAYERS FOR US GOV’S SCIENCE (out of order due to Fauci Congressional testimony & 2025 Pardon)

[johnkarls]

.
***************
1/20/2025 Addition –

The original parenthetical in the subject of this posting had said “(out of order due to 2024 Anthony Fauci Congressional testimony)” in which he admitted, though the media largely ignored it, that he had personally patented many inventions that had resulted from discoveries by the U.S. Governmental Agency he headed and that had been financed by U.S. taxpayers.

NB: This is NOT illegal (though our 11/9/2011 e-mail campaign aimed at President Obama had asked him to make it illegal) since patent law (both then and now) merely issues patents to the first applicant – rather than attempting to ascertain who actually made the invention.

*****
President Biden’s 1/19/2025 Presidential Pardon for Anthony Fauci

Anthony Fauci’s 2024 Congressional Testimony concerned his circumventing U.S. law in order to finance “gain of function” research at the Wuhan China Institute of Virology 2014-2020.

This is explained at length in the following 6/8/2024 so-called “Reply” (as our software so quaintly calls any addendum) – which is what brought the original 11/9/2011 posting forward “out of order” as if it had been posted 6/8/2024.

Although the 6/8/2024 Addendum (aka “Reply”) focused on Fauci’s “stealing” patents on discoveries financed by U.S. taxpayers, it also contained voluminous information about Fauci’s financing “gain of function” research at the Wuhan China Institute of Virology 2014-2020.

President Biden ATTEMPTED to pardon Fauci for his 1/1/2014 - 1/19/2025 behavior on 1/19/2025 – please see the photocopy of the “pardon” at https://www.justice.gov/pardon/media/1385746/dl?inline.

HOWEVER, the “pardon” is ineffectual because –

(1) U.S. Presidents can only pardon FEDERAL crimes.

(2) Murdering zillions of people is a common-law or STATE crime.

(3) Under English-American common-law, “reckless indifference” that the Wuhan “gain of function” research could result in millions of deaths (which is why the U.S. outlawed it) is sufficient intent to support a charge of murder.

(4) BTW, Fauci can never rest because there is no “statute of limitations” for common-law murder.

This common-law-murder issue was addressed at length in a 3/30/2024 posting by “Solutions” of an exchange of e-mails in connection with our 4/17/2024 meeting on “Blood Money” (viewtopic.php?f=795&t=2493&sid=cb0b0fe7 ... 9860badd50) regarding whether Anthony Fauci should be –

(A) Prosecuted at the International Criminal Court at the Hague for “Crimes Against Humanity” or

(B) Prosecuted for English-American Common Law MURDER by any local District Attorney with authority over any place where Fauci can be caught or to which he can be extradited under the U.S. Constitution’s Article IV, Sec. 2, Clause 2 (please see https://constitution.congress.gov/brows ... _00013632/).

This e-mail exchange posting was cited in the following Addendum (aka “Reply”) but the citation is so brief it is easily overlooked.

ACCORDINGLY, THE PURPOSE OF THIS ADDITION IS TO CALL ATTENTION TO THE FACT THAT PRES. BIDEN’S ATTEMPT TO PARDON FAUCI IS INEFFECTUAL.

***************End of 1/20/2025 Addition***************



***************
1/28/2025 Addition Re the U.S. Constitution’s “Extradition Clause” mentioned in the third paragraph from the end of the foregoing 1/20/2025 Addition


Since posting the foregoing 1/20/2025 Addition, many inquiries have been received about the practical feasibility of using the U.S. Constitution’s “Extradition Clause” which says --

“A Person charged in any State with Treason, Felony, or other Crime, who shall flee from Justice, and be found in another State, shall on Demand of the executive Authority of the State from which he fled, be delivered up, to be removed to the State having Jurisdiction of the Crime.”

(1) Fauci reportedly lives in the District of Columbia which famously is NOT a state. So the issue of whether the Extradition Clause applies to the District of Columbia might, notwithstanding how obvious the answer might seem, have to be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court if the Mayor of the District of Columbia refuses to extradite him.

(2) When the Extradition Clause speaks of “charged…flee from Justice…from which he fled…”, does it mean that Fauci actually had to be physically present in “the demanding state” or could any State Governor whose citizens were killed by COVID argue successfully that Fauci was in “the demanding state” by virtue of the reach of his actions?

(3) BTW, the District of Columbia could voluntarily extradite Fauci EVEN IF not required to do so under the Constitution’s Extradition Clause.

BTW, re issue (1), the District of Columbia has an extremely-complicated relationship with the Federal Government regarding which has ultimate authority (both legally and, via funding, from a practical viewpoint) – so Issue (1) above might be within the purview of the Federal Government rather than DC Mayor Muriel Bowser.

[Since the relationship is so complicated, I don’t have the time or inclination “to chase that rabbit”!!!]

However, it would seem ironic if the Federal Government has the final say on whether Fauci is extradited from the District of Columbia since his 1/19/2025 Pardon protects him from prosecution of FEDERAL crimes but the Federal Government would be extraditing him for prosecution of a STATE crime.

***************End of 1/28/2025 Addition***************



Call To Action - Six-Degrees-Of-Separation E-mail Campaign
by johnkarls » Tue Nov 15, 2011 10:25 am

.
CALL TO ACTION -- "SIX-DEGREES-OF-SEPARATION" E-MAIL CAMPAIGN = Benefiting American Taxpayers For The Scientific Discoveries Of Basic Research They Have Financed -- (ONLY 5 MINUTES NEEDED TO PARTICIPATE)

We take great pride in our Six-Degrees-Of-Separation E-mail campaigns to America's decision makers such as President Obama which, with only a few computer keyboard key strokes, can be sent by each of our members (1) to the decision maker, and (2) to all of the member's friends and acquaintances requesting them to do the same in an unending chain.

Accordingly, we also take great pride that each of our recommendations has been approved unanimously at one of our meetings or, at most, received only one dissent (in which case we say there was a "consensus" rather than "unanimity").

The following Six-Degrees-Of-Separation E-mail campaign to President Obama on the referenced subject was approve unanimously at our 11/9/2011 meeting.

If you agree with the recommended E-mail to President Obama that appears below, please --

(1) send the already-prepared e-mail to President Obama at http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact -- which will require (A) inputting your name, an e-mail address and a ZIP code, (B) selecting from the pull-down "subject" menu "economy" under "I Have A Policy Comment," and (C) pasting into the box provided the message to President Obama that appears below. [It is also recommended that you select a salutation = "Dr." from the pull-down menu before your first name and that you check the box at the end for "Contact me - a response is requested" -- both suggestions in order to maximize the chances that the message will actually be read.]

(2) send to all your friends and acquaintances an already-prepared e-mail that comprises everything below the set of asterisks that follows this paragraph -- so that, through no more than six degrees of separation to 100% of the American population, we reach everyone in a cascading chain.

*********************************************
To: All of your friends and acquaintances

Subj: CALL TO ACTION - "SIX-DEGREES-OF-SEPARATION" E-MAIL CAMPAIGN = Benefiting American Taxpayers For The Scientific Discoveries Of Basic Research They Have Financed - (ONLY 5 MINUTES NEEDED TO PARTICIPATE)

Dear Friends,

I have been requested to participate in the referenced "call to action" and request that you participate as well.

The campaign is based on the fact that there are NO MORE THAN SIX DEGREES OF SEPARATION between us and 100% of the American electorate.

And that, on important occasions, we can send to all of our friends and acquaintances an already-prepared e-mail (1) for them to send to America's decision maker(s) to influence governmental policy, and (2) for them to send to all of their friends and acquaintances to do the same in an unending chain.

The reason for the campaign is contained in the already-prepared e-mail for President Obama that appears below.

If you agree with the proposal, please --

(1) hit your e-mail forward button and put the e-mail addresses of all your friends and acquaintances into the address section so that, through no more than six degrees of separation to 100% of the American population, we reach everyone in a cascading chain.

(2) send to President Obama the already-prepared e-mail that appears below at http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact -- which will require (A) inputting your name, an e-mail address and a ZIP code, (B) selecting from the pull-down "subject" menu "economy" under "I Have A Policy Comment," and (C) pasting the following message into the box provided. [It is also recommended that you select a salutation = "Dr." from the pull-down menu before your first name and that you check the box at the end for "Contact me - a response is requested" -- both suggestions in order to maximize the chances that the message will actually be read.]


*********************************************
Benefiting American Taxpayers For The Scientific Discoveries Of Basic Research They Have Financed

President Barack Obama

Dear Mr. President:

As you are probably aware, the U.S. Government funds an incredible amount of basic research through the National Science Foundation, the National Institute of Health, the Defense Department, etc.

As you are probably also aware, the U.S. Government does not patent many of the discoveries that result from this research. Instead, companies both U.S.- and foreign-based are free to capitalize on these discoveries and, more importantly, they are free to conduct manufacturing based on these discoveries in low-wage countries such as China.

Accordingly, it is recommended that you announce a new policy accompanied by legislation, if necessary - (A) that the U.S. Government will patent all discoveries resulting from basic research that it funds, and (B) that the U.S. Government will require licensees, whether U.S.- or foreign-based, to conduct in the United States any manufacturing operations utilizing the technology.

It is recognized that many of the discoveries resulting from research conducted by the Defense Department are kept secret, much like the famous Coca Cola formula is a "trade secret." However, it should be a small matter to provide that when defense secrets finally enter the public domain, they will automatically be subject at that time to a new patent owned by the U.S. government that will become part of the program described above.

Most importantly, in addition to vigorous enforcement of the U.S. Government's patents and trade secrets under the existing provisions of the TRIPS Agreement of the 153-member World Trade Organization (WTO) which includes China, the U.S. should insist that (A) every WTO country will ban imports of goods made with the U.S. government's technology without a license, and (B) imports of other goods by WTO countries from countries that use the U.S. government's technology without a license to produce goods for internal use or export to non-WTO countries, will be subject to seizure to pay both for the royalties that should have been paid on the goods used internally or exported to non-WTO countries and also for the lost wages of American workers.

Thank you for your consideration.

[johnkarls]

.

It was heartening to see that this past Monday (6/3/2024), Anthony Fauci was forced to testify before Congress on the origin of Covid.

After all, we have considered Anthony Fauci’s ILLEGAL FUNDING of “Gain of Function” Research at the Wuhan China Institute of Virology – please see viewtopic.php?f=795&t=2492&p=3316&hilit ... 31cc#p3316 where in “BLOOD MONEY PART IV – ‘LOOT A BURNING HOUSE’” we posited:

Question 4

Had Fauci during the early part of the current century exhibited a morbid curiosity in creating new diseases by creating synthetically-engineered mutant viruses?

Answer 4

Yes.

Question 5

Was Fauci’s morbid curiosity reined in by U.S. law preventing his beloved NIAID from funding such engineering?

Answer 5

Yes.

Question 6

Did Fauci violate U.S. law by secretly going foreign??? That is, by secretly funneling funds for such illegal research to the Wuhan China Institute of Virology?

Answer 6

So it would appear.

In 2014, the U.S. Government banned any funding for gain-of-function research until an appropriate “framework” could be devised comprising criteria for ensuring such research would be both worthwhile and safe (please see the article in the U.S. Gov’s National Institutes of Health’s National Library of Medicine at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7128689/).

In 2017, the U.S. Dept of Health and Human Services promulgated that “framework” (please see https://www.phe.gov/s3/dualuse/Documents/p3co.pdf).

Nevertheless, it appears that Fauci’s “damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead” funding of COVID research at Wuhan –

(1) Proceeded during the 2014-2017 prohibition; and

(2) Probably didn’t comply with the 2017 “framework” after its promulgation since Fauci didn’t apply for it to qualify.

Indeed, on the several occasions that Fauci was hauled in front of Congressional Investigating Committees, he played “word games” such as –

(1) Whether COVID research really involved “gain of function,” and

(2) Whether his beloved NIAID (the US Gov’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of which Fauci was Director) really “funded” the Wuhan research if NIAID had given the funds to an intermediary organization for the express purpose of sending it on to the Wuhan Institute of Virology for the COVID research?

Obviously his “word games” would, in any Court of Law, be viewed as evidence of guilt.

Question 7

When COVID-19 escaped from the Wuhan Lab, did Fauci “blackmail” scientists with the threat of loss of US Gov funding for their projects if they did not join his chorus claiming that COVID originated in a Wuhan meat market?

Answer 7

So it would appear.

Question 8

Have various US Gov agencies and officials, in the wake of Fauci’s 12/31/2022 retirement, testified regarding Fauci’s “cover up”?

Answer 8

Yes.

************************************************************************
Indeed, “Solutions” posted on 3/30/2024 an exchange of e-mails in connection with that meeting on “Blood Money” (viewtopic.php?f=795&t=2493&sid=bba4f111 ... 6cbf5b9310) whether Anthony Fauci should be –

(A) Prosecuted at the International Criminal at the Hague for “Crimes Against Humanity” or

(B) Prosecuted for English-American Common Law MUDER by any local District Attorney with authority over any place where Fauci can be caught.

************************************************************************
************************************************************************
************************************************************************

WHAT APPEARS TO HAVE BEEN OVERLOOKED IN THE EXCITEMENT OF FAUCI’S TESTIMONY ABOUT THE ORIGIN OF COVID???

HIS TESTIMONY THAT HE ROUTINELY OBTAINED PATENTS FOR RESEARH FUNDED BY U.S. TAXPAYERS, MUCH OF WHICH HIS AGENCY CONDUCTED!!!

THERE HAS ALREADY BEEN BEAUCOUP REPORTING ON HOW FAUCI WAS THE HIGHEST-PAID US GOV EMPLOYEE!!!

WHY DID HE FEEL IT NECESSARY TO “STEAL” PATENTS FOR INVENTIONS FUNDED BY U.S. TAXPAYERS???

[NB: PATENT LAW, BOTH AMERICAN AND INTERNATIONAL, DOES NOT ATTEMPT TO ASCERTAIN WHO INVENTED THE TECHNOLOGY – IT ONLY ATTEMPTS TO ASCERTAIN WHO APPLIED FOR A PATENT FIRST!!!]

ON 11/9/2011, WE LAUNCHED ONE OF OUR “SIX DEGREES OF SEPARATION” E-MAIL CAMPAIGNS DIRECTED AT PRESIDENT OBAMA WITH THREE REQUESTS –

“it is recommended that you announce a new policy accompanied by legislation, if necessary - (A) that the U.S. Government will patent all discoveries resulting from basic research that it funds, and (B) that the U.S. Government will require licensees, whether U.S.- or foreign-based, to conduct in the United States any manufacturing operations utilizing the technology.

“It is recognized that many of the discoveries resulting from research conducted by the Defense Department are kept secret, much like the famous Coca Cola formula is a "trade secret." However, it should be a small matter to provide that when defense secrets finally enter the public domain, they will automatically be subject at that time to a new patent owned by the U.S. government that will become part of the program described above.

“Most importantly, in addition to vigorous enforcement of the U.S. Government's patents and trade secrets under the existing provisions of the TRIPS Agreement of the 153-member World Trade Organization (WTO) which includes China, the U.S. should insist that (A) every WTO country will ban imports of goods made with the U.S. government's technology without a license, and (B) imports of other goods by WTO countries from countries that use the U.S. government's technology without a license to produce goods for internal use or export to non-WTO countries, will be subject to seizure to pay both for the royalties that should have been paid on the goods used internally or exported to non-WTO countries and also for the lost wages of American workers.”

PRESIDENT OBAMA FAILED TO DO SO!!!

AND ANTHONY FAUCI’S DESPICABLE BEHAVIOR IN YET ONE MORE REGARD IS THE RESULT!!!

**********
IT IS RECOGNIZED THAT ATTACHING THIS UPDATE TO THE ORIGINAL 11/9/2011 CAMPAIGN IN SEC. 1 OF OUR WEBSITE WILL CAUSE IT TO BE ELEVATED TO THE TOP OF OUR LIST OF CAMPAIGNS CURRENTLY NUMBERING 58, RATHER THAN BEING BURIED IN CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER.

AND THIS IS APPROPRIATE, IN THE LIGHT OF THE SUBSEQUENT DEVELOPMENT OF WHAT HAS HAPPENED.